![]() ![]() |
|
For citations of each article, in several formats, see RePEc ISSN 1930-2975 |
Judgment and Decision MakingVolume 15, Number 4, July 2020ContentsThe title is linked to the pdf version, which should be used for printing, quotation, or citation. The html version is for convenience.Moral preferences in helping dilemmas expressed by matching and forced choice, pp. 452-475
(html). On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs, pp. 476-498
(html). Taking risks for the best: Maximizing and risk-taking tendencies, pp. 499-508
(html). Donors vastly underestimate differences in charities' effectiveness, pp. 509-516
(html). Procedural and economic utilities in consequentialist choice: Trading freedom of choice to minimize financial losses, pp. 517-533
(html). Gender differences in the trade-off between objective equality and efficiency, pp. 534-544
(html). Biased perceptions about momentum: Do comeback teams have higher chances to win in basketball, pp. 545-560
(html). Solve the dilemma by spinning a penny? On using random decision-making aids, pp. 561-571
(html). Are the symptoms really remitting? How the subjective interpretation of outcomes can produce an illusion of causality, pp. 572-585
(html). The psychology of task management: The smaller tasks trap, pp. 586-599
(html). May the odds — or your personality — be in your favor: Probability of observing a favorable outcome, Honesty-Humility, and dishonest behavior, pp. 600-610
(html). Web page maintained by baron@psych.upenn.edu; image by Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau. |