-
-
Abdellaoui, M. (2000).
Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting
functions.
Management Science, 46(11):1497--1512.
[ bib ]
-
-
Allais, M. (1953).
Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability.
Econometrica, 21:503--546.
[ bib ]
-
-
Arrow, K. J. (1971).
Essays in the Theory of Risk-Baring, volume 1.
Markham Publishing Company Chicago.
[ bib ]
-
-
Bacon, D. F., Chen, Y., Kash, I., Parkes, D. C., Rao, M., and Sridharan, M.
(2012).
Predicting your own effort.
In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on
Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 695--702.
[ bib ]
-
-
Bernoulli, D. (1954).
Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk.
Econometrica, pages 23--36.
[ bib ]
-
-
Birnbaum, M. H. (1997).
Violations of monotonicity in judgment and decision making.
In Marley, A. A. J., editor, Choice, Decision, and Measurement:
Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce, pages 73--100.
[ bib ]
-
-
Birnbaum, M. H. (2008).
New paradoxes of risky decision making.
Psychological review, 115(2):463--501.
[ bib ]
-
-
Birnbaum, M. H. and Chavez, A. (1997).
Tests of theories of decision making: Violations of branch
independence and distribution independence.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
71(2):161--194.
[ bib ]
-
-
Camerer, C. F. (2004).
Prospect theory in the wild : Evidence from the field.
In Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., and Rabin, M., editors,
Advances in Behavioral Economics, chapter 5, pages 148--161.
[ bib ]
-
-
Carvalho, A., Dimitrov, S., and Larson, K. (2013).
Inducing honest reporting without observing outcomes: An application
to the peer-review process.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.3197.
[ bib ]
-
-
Carvalho, A. and Larson, K. (2010).
Sharing a reward based on peer evaluations.
In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous
Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 1455--1456.
[ bib ]
-
-
Carvalho, A. and Larson, K. (2011).
A truth serum for sharing rewards.
In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on
Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 635--642.
[ bib ]
-
-
Carvalho, A. and Larson, K. (2012).
Sharing rewards among strangers based on peer evaluations.
Decision Analysis, 9(3):253--273.
[ bib ]
-
-
Gneiting, T. and Raftery, A. E. (2007).
Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation.
Journal of the American Statistical Association,
102(477):359--378.
[ bib ]
-
-
Gonzalez, R. and Wu, G. (1999).
On the shape of the probability weighting function.
Cognitive psychology, 38(1):129--166.
[ bib ]
-
-
Hanson, R. (2003).
Combinatorial information market design.
Information Systems Frontiers, 5(1):107--119.
[ bib ]
-
-
Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. K. (2002).
Risk aversion and incentive effects.
American Economic Review, 92(5):1644--1655.
[ bib ]
-
-
Johnstone, D. J. (2011).
Economic interpretation of probabilities estimated by maximum
likelihood or score.
Management Science, 57(2):308--314.
[ bib ]
-
-
Johnstone, D. J., Jose, V. R. R., and Winkler, R. L. (2011).
Tailored scoring rules for probabilities.
Decision Analysis, 8:256--268.
[ bib ]
-
-
Jose, V. R. (2009).
A characterization for the spherical scoring rule.
Theory and Decision, 66(3):263--281.
[ bib ]
-
-
Kothiyal, A., Spinu, V., and Wakker, P. P. (2011).
Comonotonic proper scoring rules to measure ambiguity and subjective
beliefs.
Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 17(3-4):101--113.
[ bib ]
-
-
Nakazono, Y. (2013).
Strategic behavior of federal open market committee board members:
Evidence from members' forecasts.
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93:62--70.
[ bib ]
-
-
Offerman, T., Sonnemans, J., Van De Kuilen, G., and Wakker, P. P. (2009).
A truth serum for non-bayesians: Correcting proper scoring rules for
risk attitudes.
Review of Economic Studies, 76(4):1461--1489.
[ bib ]
-
-
Prelec, D. (1998).
The probability weighting function.
Econometrica, 66(3):497--527.
[ bib ]
-
-
Quiggin, J. (1982).
A theory of anticipated utility.
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4):323--343.
[ bib ]
-
-
Rabin, M. (2000).
Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem.
Econometrica, 68(5):1281--1292.
[ bib ]
-
-
Rose, H., Rogers, A., and Gerding, E. H. (2012).
A scoring rule-based mechanism for aggregate demand prediction in the
smart grid.
In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on
Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 661--668.
[ bib ]
-
-
Savage, L. J. (1971).
Elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations.
Journal of the American Statistical Association,
66(336):783--801.
[ bib ]
-
-
Schmeidler, D. (1989).
Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity.
Econometrica, 57(3):571--587.
[ bib ]
-
-
Selten, R. (1998).
Axiomatic characterization of the quadratic scoring rule.
Experimental Economics, 1(1):43--62.
[ bib ]
-
-
Starmer, C. (2000).
Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a
descriptive theory of choice under risk.
Journal of Economic Literature, pages 332--382.
[ bib ]
-
-
Tetlock, P. E. (2005).
Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?
Princeton University Press.
[ bib ]
-
-
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992).
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of
uncertainty.
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4):297--323.
[ bib ]
-
-
Van de Kuilen, G. (2009).
Subjective probability weighting and the discovered preference
hypothesis.
Theory and Decision, 67(1):1--22.
[ bib ]
-
-
Wakker, P. P. (2010).
Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity.
Cambridge University Press.
[ bib ]
-
-
Wakker, P. P. and Deneffe, D. (1996).
Eliciting von neumann-morgenstern utilities when probabilities are
distorted or unknown.
Management Science, 42(8):1131--1150.
[ bib ]
-
-
Winkler, R. L. (1969).
Scoring rules and the evaluation of probability assessors.
Journal of the American Statistical Association,
64(327):1073--1078.
[ bib ]
-
-
Winkler, R. L. and Murphy, A. H. (1968).
“good” probability assessors.
Journal of Applied Meteorology, 7(5):751--758.
[ bib ]
-
-
Winkler, R. L. and Murphy, A. H. (1970).
Nonlinear utility and the probability score.
Journal of Applied Meteorology, 9:143--148.
[ bib ]
This file was generated by
bibtex2html 1.98.