Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science, 46(11):1497--1512. [ bib ]
 
Allais, M. (1953). Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. Econometrica, 21:503--546. [ bib ]
 
Arrow, K. J. (1971). Essays in the Theory of Risk-Baring, volume 1. Markham Publishing Company Chicago. [ bib ]
 
Bacon, D. F., Chen, Y., Kash, I., Parkes, D. C., Rao, M., and Sridharan, M. (2012). Predicting your own effort. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 695--702. [ bib ]
 
Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica, pages 23--36. [ bib ]
 
Birnbaum, M. H. (1997). Violations of monotonicity in judgment and decision making. In Marley, A. A. J., editor, Choice, Decision, and Measurement: Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce, pages 73--100. [ bib ]
 
Birnbaum, M. H. (2008). New paradoxes of risky decision making. Psychological review, 115(2):463--501. [ bib ]
 
Birnbaum, M. H. and Chavez, A. (1997). Tests of theories of decision making: Violations of branch independence and distribution independence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71(2):161--194. [ bib ]
 
Camerer, C. F. (2004). Prospect theory in the wild : Evidence from the field. In Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., and Rabin, M., editors, Advances in Behavioral Economics, chapter 5, pages 148--161. [ bib ]
 
Carvalho, A., Dimitrov, S., and Larson, K. (2013). Inducing honest reporting without observing outcomes: An application to the peer-review process. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.3197. [ bib ]
 
Carvalho, A. and Larson, K. (2010). Sharing a reward based on peer evaluations. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 1455--1456. [ bib ]
 
Carvalho, A. and Larson, K. (2011). A truth serum for sharing rewards. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 635--642. [ bib ]
 
Carvalho, A. and Larson, K. (2012). Sharing rewards among strangers based on peer evaluations. Decision Analysis, 9(3):253--273. [ bib ]
 
Gneiting, T. and Raftery, A. E. (2007). Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(477):359--378. [ bib ]
 
Gonzalez, R. and Wu, G. (1999). On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive psychology, 38(1):129--166. [ bib ]
 
Hanson, R. (2003). Combinatorial information market design. Information Systems Frontiers, 5(1):107--119. [ bib ]
 
Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5):1644--1655. [ bib ]
 
Johnstone, D. J. (2011). Economic interpretation of probabilities estimated by maximum likelihood or score. Management Science, 57(2):308--314. [ bib ]
 
Johnstone, D. J., Jose, V. R. R., and Winkler, R. L. (2011). Tailored scoring rules for probabilities. Decision Analysis, 8:256--268. [ bib ]
 
Jose, V. R. (2009). A characterization for the spherical scoring rule. Theory and Decision, 66(3):263--281. [ bib ]
 
Kothiyal, A., Spinu, V., and Wakker, P. P. (2011). Comonotonic proper scoring rules to measure ambiguity and subjective beliefs. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 17(3-4):101--113. [ bib ]
 
Nakazono, Y. (2013). Strategic behavior of federal open market committee board members: Evidence from members' forecasts. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93:62--70. [ bib ]
 
Offerman, T., Sonnemans, J., Van De Kuilen, G., and Wakker, P. P. (2009). A truth serum for non-bayesians: Correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes. Review of Economic Studies, 76(4):1461--1489. [ bib ]
 
Prelec, D. (1998). The probability weighting function. Econometrica, 66(3):497--527. [ bib ]
 
Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4):323--343. [ bib ]
 
Rabin, M. (2000). Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica, 68(5):1281--1292. [ bib ]
 
Rose, H., Rogers, A., and Gerding, E. H. (2012). A scoring rule-based mechanism for aggregate demand prediction in the smart grid. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 661--668. [ bib ]
 
Savage, L. J. (1971). Elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(336):783--801. [ bib ]
 
Schmeidler, D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica, 57(3):571--587. [ bib ]
 
Selten, R. (1998). Axiomatic characterization of the quadratic scoring rule. Experimental Economics, 1(1):43--62. [ bib ]
 
Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature, pages 332--382. [ bib ]
 
Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? Princeton University Press. [ bib ]
 
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4):297--323. [ bib ]
 
Van de Kuilen, G. (2009). Subjective probability weighting and the discovered preference hypothesis. Theory and Decision, 67(1):1--22. [ bib ]
 
Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity. Cambridge University Press. [ bib ]
 
Wakker, P. P. and Deneffe, D. (1996). Eliciting von neumann-morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown. Management Science, 42(8):1131--1150. [ bib ]
 
Winkler, R. L. (1969). Scoring rules and the evaluation of probability assessors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(327):1073--1078. [ bib ]
 
Winkler, R. L. and Murphy, A. H. (1968). “good” probability assessors. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 7(5):751--758. [ bib ]
 
Winkler, R. L. and Murphy, A. H. (1970). Nonlinear utility and the probability score. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 9:143--148. [ bib ]

This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.98.