What the RPs thought the study was about
I am not sure, probably guessing chances of success based on your advantages/disadvantages
How confident people feel when they have different tools to solve same task
The ability to complete tasks based on the type of tool available
Change of behavior when people have a competitive strength
If people are competitive doing games that don't count for anything
When people are given different obstacles for things (life) how discouraged or confident will they be to complete it
I think it is to see if we actually do better if we have an opponent. Like mirror image in psych.
To gage how much we actually judge others
Confidence in ones self to complete a task
The correlation between tool and likelihood to win the game
Luck of the draw, how willing are people to try and win with only what they are given
The capability of competitiveness when given an equal chance of getting tools and completing the same tasks
I thought this experiment was a lot of fun! I would do it again if I could
To observe the reactions of the subjects, and how they will feel with the feeling of be competitive
Based on the experiment title, Judgemnet of success, I'm guessing it supposed to test participants about their expected outcome or a certain circumstance (success/failure)
About using different tools on doing different tasks. Considering about the rate of successful of each experiment.
About overconfidence. If we can get things being realistic.
Perception of the tasks and difficulty in betting given different tools.
Studying how different tools will affect a task.
It's about analyzing your possibility of success and analyzing how well your competitor will success.
How do we think the chance of success depend on the tools?
Does knowing your competitor has a better tool than you make you do worse?
Cordination and how well one can use an object given to them.
Your ability to doing something when comparing to others.
It's interesting and cool. Never thought of doing this type of experiment.
testing how sometimes people have more advantages than others but sometimes people with the limitations can still do just as well
Ideas on how you see yourself completing a task given certain tools compaired to others with different tools
Discover people who will have gambling problems in the future.
To see how confident people still are with the tools they're given
To see if we favoured our chances based on the other participant's tools
It wants to know people's reaction and people's thoughts
To see reactions people have when performing the same task as another person
Probably along the lines of pressure or unfairness in terms of tools given and how people react
About judging whether or not you can complete a task with accuracy
How oneself is naturally competive and tries to size up the competion. How one person can rate their likelihood at bring successful on anothers
I feel like it's an experiment that designed to figure out how people think they will do and how they really do.Because sometimes people think too highly or too lowly to themselves.
How our confidence grows when we are put against another person
Giving us tasks that we can complete easily but seeing what we think our chances our vs our competitor
Seeing how tools impact our confidence of completing a task
I believe this experiment aims to evaluate how people perceive success, both in terms of what we believe we are capable of, and in terms of what we think given the circumstances of a task.
Perception of judging a result of something before actually doing it
Competition of others around us and how it affects our behavior
To see how much someone can rate their success purely by their given tool and the other's tool.
It was to decide if peoples confidence would go up with a more useful object then the other person
If the equipment in comparison w/ another person will couse you to judge your own successness
About completing a task with tools/objects
Implied competition between two people given advantages or disadvantages over the other
Seeing how different things change how likely we think we will succeed.
Probably to judge how confident we are in our abilities to do simple tasks
Seems fun.It could be about how people think they compare to others by using different tools to complete a task
This experiment seems interesting. There's physical activity involved making it fun and entertaining and a series different tasks to do.
It is testing how sure we are of ourselves
I think this experiment is about how we feel about how we can complete tasks
Pass/fail tasks that measure confidence in a participant.
I think the experiment is about what we consider successful. For example, if we were happy with the tools we selected.
Your judgement of potentional success on any activity after receiving objects that vary in efficiency.
How confident we are about our abilities to perform tasks when given advantageous/disadvantageous obejcts to succeed.
The experiment measures how much confidence a person has in relation to the tools they were given to complete a task.
Figuring out if our predictions are accurate, and how we predict the other person.
How we observe certain things? How competitive people are.
To see if we accurately judge our own and the other participant's chances of success, and the differences between them.
Perceptions of competitive factors and probabilities.
How we judge being successful or not and how having someone else do the same tasks feels like a competition.
I believe that this experiment is about coordination between the hand and eye.
Looking at odds based on the things you have.

Additional comments/thoughts the RPs had
This seems better than the other research I've been doing
Seems more fun than sitting in front of a computer
videos are not necessary proctor should just demonstrate
I think that psychology experiments should be conducted similar to this. "Hands on." It makes it make more sense.
Shouldn't it be more mind-bending? We think we are less likely to success when we have worse tools.