[ View menu ]
Main

The Bulgarian coincidence

Filed in Ideas
Subscribe to Decision Science News by Email (one email per week, easy unsubscribe)

LAND OF MYSTERIOUS REPETITION

Bulg_Prov2

Decision Science News used to think of Bulgaria as a haven for cheap skiing, but has recently learned that it is the land of magical coincidences.

On September 6th, the winning lBulgarian ottery numbers were

4, 15, 23, 24, 35 and 42

Amazing? Hardly. But on the very next play of the lottery the winning numbers were

4, 15, 23, 24, 35 and 42

Amazing? Yes. Coincidence? Maybe. Shenanigans? Maybe. Eighteen people bet on the winning numbers the second time around, which is technically a fraction of the Bulgarian population. According to the BBC an investigation is underway.

Friend of DSN and professional R meister David Smith has done his own analysis of the problem and figures that

given conservative assumptions, there’s just over a 1% chance of a back-to-back drawings somewhere in the world over a 50-year period.

David concludes the Bulgarian lottery result “is not so quite so surprising after all”.

But what we have here is the probability of the data given the null (randomness) at 1%. And what do most scientists do when the probability of the data given the null is less than 5%?

2 Comments

  1. Dennis O'Brien says:

    Given the number of state and national lotteries worldwide and their various win probabilities, how often should we expect a lottery to have identical consecutive winning numbers?

    October 9, 2009 @ 12:31 pm

  2. Thom says:

    This estimate looks a little low – my very rough quick estimate based on 400 lotteries per week was about .15% in one year. I may have messed up the calculation slightly, but including all the multiple draws and regional as well as National lotteries you could easily get higher probabilities. The UK alone has at least 6 National draws per week.

    October 18, 2009 @ 11:29 am

RSS feed Comments

Write Comment

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>