<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Difference Between Significant and Not Significant is Not Statistically Significant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.decisionsciencenews.com/2006/12/06/the-difference-between-significant-and-not-significant-is-not-statistically-significant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.decisionsciencenews.com/2006/12/06/the-difference-between-significant-and-not-significant-is-not-statistically-significant/</link>
	<description>A website about decision research in Marketing, Psychology, Economics, Behavioral Economics, Finance, Medicine, Law, Management, Public Policy, Statistics, Computer Science.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:44:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Difference Between Significant and Not Significant is Not Statistically Significant</title>
		<link>http://www.decisionsciencenews.com/2006/12/06/the-difference-between-significant-and-not-significant-is-not-statistically-significant/comment-page-1/#comment-7665</link>
		<dc:creator>The Difference Between Significant and Not Significant is Not Statistically Significant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decisionsciencenews.com/?p=176#comment-7665</guid>
		<description>[...] Decision science news has a post on hypothesis testing that I find relevant. Some well-made points grow old while no one pays attention to them. One of the most embarrassing for social science is its categorical perception of p-values. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Decision science news has a post on hypothesis testing that I find relevant. Some well-made points grow old while no one pays attention to them. One of the most embarrassing for social science is its categorical perception of p-values. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bulgarian coincidence &#124; Life Science Articles</title>
		<link>http://www.decisionsciencenews.com/2006/12/06/the-difference-between-significant-and-not-significant-is-not-statistically-significant/comment-page-1/#comment-2300</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bulgarian coincidence &#124; Life Science Articles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decisionsciencenews.com/?p=176#comment-2300</guid>
		<description>[...] what we have here is the probability of the data given the null (randomness) at 1%. And what do most scientists do when the probability of the data given the null is less than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what we have here is the probability of the data given the null (randomness) at 1%. And what do most scientists do when the probability of the data given the null is less than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Café Krelbow :: Interpreting p-values</title>
		<link>http://www.decisionsciencenews.com/2006/12/06/the-difference-between-significant-and-not-significant-is-not-statistically-significant/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Café Krelbow :: Interpreting p-values</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decisionsciencenews.com/?p=176#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] Dan Goldstein made this amusing graph: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan Goldstein made this amusing graph: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

